Comparison with Other Services
How is Reading Forest different?
Find the Best Reading Record Method for You
There are many options for keeping reading records: paper notebooks, Excel, reading management apps, and more. Compare the features of each to find the method that suits your style. This page explains in detail how Reading Forest differs from other methods.
Paper Notebook vs Reading Forest
Paper notebooks are a traditional method with many enthusiasts. How does Reading Forest compare?
Paper Notebook
Traditional handwritten recording method
- Warmth of handwriting, free layout
- No digital devices needed, write anywhere
- Draw illustrations and diagrams freely
- Can't search, hard to find past records
- Difficult to backup, risk of loss
- Can't access without carrying it with you
- Tedious to correct mistakes
Reading Forest Recommended
Efficient digital management
- Find instantly with keyword search
- Auto backup, cloud storage
- Share across multiple devices
- Easy to edit and revise
- Math formulas (MathJax) supported
- Write summaries and review to retain memory
- Digital device required
- Lacks warmth of handwriting
Who Should Choose What
Paper Notebook Is Right For
Those who love handwriting, are not comfortable with digital devices, use many illustrations and diagrams, or enjoy browsing through their notebooks
Reading Forest Is Right For
Those who read many books, want to search past records, use multiple devices, prioritize backups, or want to remember what they read longer
Using Both Is Also Recommended
A popular hybrid approach is to take handwritten notes in a paper notebook, then digitize only the important parts in Reading Forest. Get the best of both worlds.
Differences from Other Reading Management Services
How does Reading Forest differ from other reading management services like Goodreads, LibraryThing, and others?
| Feature | Reading Forest | Goodreads | LibraryThing | Other Apps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reading Records | ||||
| Notes & Quotes | ||||
| Summarize & Review for Memory Retention | ||||
| Math Formulas (MathJax) | ||||
| Rich Text Formatting (HTML) | ||||
| Full Data Export | ||||
| Offline Use | ||||
| Local File Storage | ||||
| Social Features (Community) | ||||
| Reading Graphs & Statistics | ||||
| Book Information Database | ||||
| Advertisements | Yes (Free version) | Yes (Free version) | Yes (Free version) | Yes (Free version) |
| Data Ownership | Fully User-Owned | Service-Owned | Service-Owned | Service-Owned |
Reading Forest's Unique Features
- Math Formulas (MathJax): Perfect for recording technical and math books. Display complex formulas beautifully
- Offline Use Available: After initial login, you can add and edit records offline (Google Drive sync and ISBN search require internet)
- Full Data Ownership: Save as local files with no worries about service discontinuation
- Subtle Advertising: Even free version has unobtrusive ads so you can focus on reading records (Paid plans are completely ad-free)
- Privacy-Focused: No social features, so no worry about others seeing your reading records
Other Services' Strengths
- Social Features: Other services are convenient for those who want to interact with fellow book lovers and share impressions
- Reading Graphs: Other services offer rich monthly/yearly reading statistics visualization
- Community: Other services are best for discovering recommended books and referring to reviews
Which Service Should You Choose?
Reading Forest: For those who prioritize privacy, read many technical books, want offline use (after login), and want to manage their own data
Goodreads/LibraryThing: For those who want to interact with reading friends, discover recommended books, and enjoy reading graphs
Comparison with Excel & Notepad
Many people keep reading records in Excel or notepad. How does a dedicated app compare?
Excel
Managing with spreadsheet software
- Free layout, high customizability
- Good at graphs and aggregation
- Auto-calculate with formulas
- Requires initial setup, tedious format creation
- Excel software required, hard to edit on mobile
- Not suitable for long notes
Notepad / Text Editor
Simple text files
- Simplest, anyone can use
- Lightweight, starts quickly
- Opens in any environment
- Weak search functionality
- Can't manage books or filter
- Plain appearance, no decoration
Reading Forest Purpose-Built
Optimized for reading records
- Ready to use, no setup required
- Organize by book, easy search & filter
- Readable records with Markdown & formulas
- Auto-fetch book info with ISBN search
- Manage reading progress and completion dates
- Not as flexible as Excel
Detailed Comparison Table
| Item | Reading Forest | Excel | Notepad |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Setup | Not Required | Required (Format creation) | Not Required |
| ISBN Search | |||
| Auto Book Info Fetch | |||
| Search Function | Powerful (Full-text search) | Normal (Ctrl+F) | Weak (Ctrl+F) |
| Filtering | |||
| Sorting | |||
| Rich Text Formatting (HTML) | |||
| Math Formulas (MathJax) | |||
| Graphs & Statistics | |||
| Mobile Support | |||
| Cloud Storage | |||
| Flexibility | Medium | High | Low |
| Learning Curve | Low | Medium-High | Low |
| Additional Software Needed | No (Browser only) | Yes (Excel software) | No |
Which Should You Choose?
Excel Is Right For
Those skilled at statistics and graph creation, who want custom formats, are comfortable with Excel, and want detailed customization
Notepad Is Right For
Those who love simplicity, don't need decoration, want to write long free-form impressions, and prefer lightweight tools
Reading Forest Is Right For
Those who want to start immediately, streamline book management, read many technical books, utilize search and filtering, or want to remember what they read longer
Choose the Method That's Right for You
The best reading record method depends on your reading style and preferences.
Understand each option's characteristics and choose what works for you.
Reading Forest is free to start, so why not give it a try?
No credit card required • Cancel anytime